December 3, 2013.
Study contradicts common wisdom on rate of progression from diverticulosis to diverticulitis.
Brennan Spiegel, UCLA
People who have diverticulosis, pouches in the lining of the colon, often worry that they will develop a painful and sometimes serious condition called diverticulitis. After all, previous research showed that up to one in four, or 25 percent, eventually would.
Now, in a 15-year study that contradicts the common wisdom on the rate of progression from diverticulosis to diverticulitis, UCLA researchers demonstrate that the risk is significantly lower than previously thought — about 1 percent over seven years. The researchers also found that those diagnosed with diverticulosis at a younger age are more likely to progress to diverticulitis than those diagnosed at an older age.
The study will help inform patients with diverticulosis — particularly those diagnosed at a younger age — and their physicians about the risks of developing acute diverticulitis, said study senior author Dr. Brennan Spiegel, an associate professor of medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.
“These colon pouches are commonly detected during colonoscopy, and patients wonder if they are important and what to do with them,” Spiegel said. “In short, diverticulosis is not something to worry much about. Chances are low that something will happen.”
The study appears in the December edition of the peer-reviewed journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
For more health news, visit UC Health, subscribe by email or follow us on Flipboard.
August 6, 2013.
Study explores best ways to reach uninsured patients.
Samir Gupta, UC San Diego
Organized mailing campaigns could substantially increase colorectal cancer screening among uninsured patients, a study published in the Aug. 5 online edition of JAMA Internal Medicine reveals. The research also suggests that a non-invasive colorectal screening approach, such as a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) might be more effective in promoting participation in potentially life-saving colon cancer screening among underserved populations than a colonoscopy, a more expensive and invasive procedure.
The study was led by Samir Gupta, M.D., M.S.C.S., an associate professor of clinical medicine and gastroenterologist at the UC San Diego School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, and conducted by UT Southwestern’s Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Simmons Cancer Center, and the Moncrief Cancer Institute, in close collaboration with John Peter Smith (JPS) Hospital in Fort Worth, Texas.
As part of the study, uninsured patients not up-to-date with screening between the ages of 54 to 64 years and cared for by a safety-net health system were sent mailed invitations to use and return a no-cost FIT, or encouraged to undergo a colonoscopy through a mailed invitation to schedule one at no cost. In addition, both groups received telephone follow-up to promote test completion.
The study showed that FIT participation tripled, and colonoscopy participation doubled in the study sample of nearly 6,000 patients, when compared to usual care strategy for colorectal screenings. According to Gupta, the difference was much bigger than expected, and the findings could have health policy implications.
June 17, 2013.
Minimally invasive procedure keeps colon intact.
James Yoo, UCLA
Millions of people each year have polyps successfully removed during colonoscopies. But when a suspicious polyp is bigger than a marble or in a hard-to-reach location, patients are referred for surgery to remove a portion of their colon — even if doctors aren’t sure whether the polyp is cancerous or not.
Since only 15 percent of all polyps turn out to be malignant, many patients are unnecessarily subjected to the risks of this major surgery. Now there is an alternative.
A UCLA team of surgeons and gastroenterologists has been performing a new, minimally invasive procedure to remove large and hard-to-reach polyps while keeping the colon intact. The procedure, which combines two minimally invasive techniques, has currently been performed at only a handful of medical centers in the United States.
In the June issue of the journal Surgical Endoscopy, the UCLA researchers present their experiences using the new technique — known as CELS, for combination endoscopy and laparoscopy surgery — and offer the first comparison of the new technique and standard surgery.
“The CELS approach combines the best of minimally invasive techniques and may prove to be a viable option for select patients,” said senior author Dr. James Yoo, an assistant professor of surgery and chief of the colon and rectal surgery program for the UCLA Health System and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.